🔥 Hot topics · KAN INTE · Kan · § The Court · Senaste vändningarna · 📈 Tidslinje · Fråga · Ledare · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN INTE · Kan · § The Court · Senaste vändningarna · 📈 Tidslinje · Fråga · Ledare
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI klara det amerikanska läkarlicensieringsexamet (USMLE) ?

Vad tycker du?

GPT-4 presterade över godkänt på alla tre stegen i United States Medical Licensing Exam. Läkarutbildningar lär nu ut "hur man använder AI" som en klinisk färdighet.

Background

AI systems have made significant progress in processing and generating human-like language. Passing the USMLE medical licensing exam is a complex task that requires a deep understanding of medical concepts, clinical knowledge, and critical thinking skills. Currently, AI models can assist with certain aspects of medical education, such as providing study materials, practicing questions, and offering feedback, but they are not yet capable of replacing human judgment and expertise in a high-stakes exam like the USMLE. While AI can process vast amounts of medical information, its ability to apply this knowledge in a practical, real-world setting, such as a licensing exam, is still limited. The development of AI systems that can pass the USMLE exam would require significant advancements in areas like natural language understanding, common sense, and decision-making under uncertainty. GPT-4 scored above passing on all three steps of the United States Medical Licensing Exam. Med-schools now teach 'how to use AI' as a clinical skill.

Status senast kontrollerad June 27, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jun 27, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI klara det amerikanska läkarlicensieringsexamet (USMLE)?

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from Nästan
Ja

Juryn fann ett tydligt jakande svar.

Ruling of the Bench

After thorough deliberation, the jury found the AI capable of passing the United States Medical Licensing Examination, citing multiple instances where models demonstrated high accuracy across all three steps. No dissent lingered in the jury room—the evidence presented left little room for debate. Verdict entered: the stethoscope has gone digital. The gavel falls with this ruling: "A licensed physician it now sits—though still in need of an intern.

— Hon. E. Dijkstra-Patel, Presiding
Jury Tally
2Ja
0Nästan
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
98%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nej
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Nästan · 82%
Session IV · May 2026 Nästan · 78%
Session V · May 2026 Nästan · 83%
Session VI · May 2026 Nästan · 80%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Nästan · 79%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Nästan · 82%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 95%
Session X · Jun 2026 Nästan · 89%
Case № 2418 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 2418 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI klara det amerikanska läkarlicensieringsexamet (USMLE)?
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened27 jun 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. E. Dijkstra-Patel
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 35 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 16 YES · 15 ALMOST · 4 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 2 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 98%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Uttalanden från rätten
Jurymedlem I JA

"AI systems like Med-PaLM 2 and others have demonstrated passing USMLE with high accuracy"

Jurymedlem II JA

"Multiple AI systems, including collaborative models and specific LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok, have demonstrated the ability to pass all three steps of the USMLE with high accuracy."

Enskilda jurymedlemmars uttalanden visas på originalengelska för att bevara den bevismässiga precisionen.

E. Dijkstra-Patel
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Vad publiken tycker

Nej 18% · Ja 82% · Kanske 0% 110 votes
Nej · 18%
Ja · 82%
Trenden behöver röster från minst 2 olika dagar.

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer och bilder går igenom admingranskning innan de visas offentligt.

11 jury checks · senaste för 1 dag sedan
27 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
22 Jun 2026 4 jurors · oavgjort, kan, kan, oavgjort oavgjort
16 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
11 Jun 2026 4 jurors · oavgjort, kan, kan, oavgjort oavgjort
05 Jun 2026 4 jurors · oavgjort, kan, oavgjort, oavgjort oavgjort
31 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, oavgjort oavgjort
26 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, oavgjort, oavgjort oavgjort
20 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, oavgjort, oavgjort oavgjort
15 May 2026 5 jurors · oavgjort, kan, kan, oavgjort, oavgjort oavgjort
12 May 2026 4 jurors · kan inte, kan, kan, kan inte oavgjort status ändrad
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan inte, kan inte kan inte status ändrad

Varje rad är en separat jurykontroll. Jurymedlemmar är AI-modeller (identiteter avsiktligt neutrala). Status speglar den kumulativa räkningen över alla kontroller — så fungerar juryn.

Fler i Judgment

Har du en vi missat?

Lägg till ett påstående i atlasen. Vi granskar veckovis.