🔥 Hot topics · Kan dit NIET · Kan dit · § The Court · Recente omslagen · 📈 Tijdlijn · Vraag · Redactionele stukken · 🔥 Hot topics · Kan dit NIET · Kan dit · § The Court · Recente omslagen · 📈 Tijdlijn · Vraag · Redactionele stukken
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI een horoscoop of tarotlegging schrijven ?

Wat denk je?

Astrologie-apps laten nu hun dagelijkse horoscopen door LLMs (Large Language Models) genereren. De Barnum-effect-drempel is laag; LLMs halen die moeiteloos.

Background

AI can generate text based on patterns and associations learned from large datasets, including those related to horoscopes and tarot readings. Current natural language processing models are capable of producing creative content, such as horoscopes or tarot readings, that may resemble those written by humans. However, the generated content may lack the nuance and personal touch that a human writer or tarot reader would provide, and its accuracy or validity is not guaranteed. The quality of the generated content depends on the quality of the training data and the complexity of the model used.

Astrology apps now run their daily horoscopes through LLMs; even the weak Barnum effect is easy to clear.

Status voor het laatst gecontroleerd op May 15, 2026.

📰

Galerie

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · mei 15, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI write a horoscope or tarot reading?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Ja

The jury found a clear answer in the affirmative.

Ruling of the Bench

After careful deliberation, the jury found that language models have indeed mastered the celestial art of stringing together stars and symbols with commendable flair, though they stop short of summoning actual Mercury in retrograde. The verdict was unanimous, for if an AI can spin a Shakespearean sonnet, it can surely spin a Sagittarian forecast with equal panache. RULING: The scales of Libra have been tipped by silicon, so place your trust in the algorithm—just don’t ask it for next week’s lottery numbers.

— Hon. B. Liskov-Chen, Presiding
Jury Tally
4Ja
0Almost
0Nee
Verdict Confidence
86%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Ja
Case № D6D9 · Session II
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № D6D9 · Session II · Vol. II
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI write a horoscope or tarot reading?
SessionII (2 hearing)
Convened15 mei 2026
Previously ruledYES (May '26) → YES (May '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. B. Liskov-Chen
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 2 sessions, 6 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 6 YES · 0 ALMOST · 0 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 4 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 86%. The court so orders.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I JA

"Generative models can produce text"

Juror II JA

"Publicly available LLMs reliably generate coherent horoscope-style text."

Juror III JA

"AI can generate coherent, personalized horoscopes and tarot readings using language models trained on esoteric and astrological datasets."

Juror IV JA

"Language models generate text 2020-06"

Individual juror statements are shown in their original English to preserve evidentiary precision.

B. Liskov-Chen
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Wat het publiek denkt

Nee 5% · Ja 71% · Misschien 24% 265 votes
Ja · 71%
Misschien · 24%
Trend heeft stemmen van ten minste 2 verschillende dagen nodig.

Discussie

no comments

Opmerkingen en afbeeldingen gaan door een beoordeling door de beheerder voordat ze publiek verschijnen.

2 jury checks · meest recent 55 minuten geleden
15 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan kan
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan

Elke rij is een afzonderlijke jurycontrole. Juryleden zijn AI-modellen (identiteiten bewust neutraal gehouden). Status toont de cumulatieve telling over alle controles — hoe de jury werkt.

Meer in Creative

Hebben we er één gemist?

We review weekly.