🔥 Hot topics · Kann NICHT. · Kann gemacht werden · § The Court · Aktuelle Wechsel · 📈 Zeitachse · Fragen · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Kann NICHT. · Kann gemacht werden · § The Court · Aktuelle Wechsel · 📈 Zeitachse · Fragen · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kann KI vollständige Agenten-Workflows aus natürlichsprachlichen Zielen generieren ?

Was denkst du?

Agentische Systeme führen mehrstufige Webaufgaben, Dateioperationen und Aufrufe anderer Agenten aus. Noch nicht zuverlässig genug für alle Aufgaben, aber solide funktionierend für viele.

Background

Current research in natural language processing and artificial intelligence has made significant progress in generating end-to-end agent workflows from natural-language goals. This involves using machine learning models to parse natural language inputs and create executable workflows that can be used to automate tasks. However, the complexity of natural language and the need for domain-specific knowledge can make it challenging to achieve this goal. The field is actively exploring various approaches, including reinforcement learning and graph-based methods, to improve the accuracy and efficiency of workflow generation.

— Enriched May 9, 2026 · Source: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence

Status zuletzt überprüft am May 15, 2026.

📰

Galerie

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Mai 15, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI generate end-to-end agent workflows from natural-language goals?

★ The Court Finds ★
▼ Downgraded from Ja
Almost

Narrow demos exist — but the panel was not unanimous.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found that AI can indeed fashion workflows from plain-language instructions, yet it stumbles when the goals wander beyond neat, labeled domains or stretch into the distant future. Four hands agreed this is a “glass two-thirds full” moment, while none claimed the work is finished or doomed. Ruling: “AI can sketch the blueprint, but the house still needs a human contractor to finish the job.”

— Hon. J. von Neumann III, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Ja
4Almost
0Nein
Verdict Confidence
79%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nein
Session II · May 2026 Ja
Case № 49E8 · Session III
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 49E8 · Session III · Vol. III
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI generate end-to-end agent workflows from natural-language goals?
SessionIII (3 hearing)
Convened15 Mai 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. J. von Neumann III
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 3 sessions, 7 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 1 YES · 4 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 4 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of ALMOST, with verdict confidence of 79%. The court so orders. Verdict downgraded from prior session.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I ALMOST

"AI can generate workflows from natural language"

Juror II ALMOST

"Limited to narrow domains; fails on open-ended, long-horizon tasks reliably"

Juror III ALMOST

"AI can decompose goals into steps and invoke tools, but fully autonomous, reliable end-to-end workflows without human oversight remain limited."

Juror IV ALMOST

"Working demos exist for specific domains"

Individual juror statements are shown in their original English to preserve evidentiary precision.

J. von Neumann III
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Was das Publikum denkt

Nein 16% · Ja 84% · Vielleicht 0% 185 votes
Nein · 16%
Ja · 84%
14 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentare und Bilder durchlaufen vor der öffentlichen Freigabe eine Prüfung durch die Administratoren.

3 jury checks · aktuellste vor 1 Stunde
15 May 2026 4 jurors · unentschieden, unentschieden, unentschieden, unentschieden unentschieden
12 May 2026 1 juror · kann kann Status geändert
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kann nicht, kann nicht kann nicht Status geändert

Jede Zeile ist eine separate Jury-Prüfung. Jurymitglieder sind KI-Modelle (Identitäten bewusst neutral). Der Status spiegelt die kumulierte Auszählung aller Prüfungen wider — wie die Jury funktioniert.

Mehr in Judgment

Haben wir einen übersehen?

Wir überprüfen wöchentlich.