🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI bestå en amerikansk kørekortteoretisk prøve i alle 50 delstater ?

Hvad mener du?

Stat for stat, inklusive vejskiltsspørgsmål og kantregler. Trivielt for enhver moderne frontier-LLM.

Background

Each U.S. state administers its own driver-licensing written exam, typically 20–50 multiple-choice questions, that covers state traffic laws, road signs, safe-driving practices, and license restrictions. Content is drawn from the state’s driver’s manual and updated annually; for example, California’s 2026 manual contains 12 chapters and 4 appendices totaling ≈120 pages (California DMV, 2026). Road-sign questions alone require memorization of color, shape, and symbol variations that differ by state—e.g., the “Truck Route” sign is black-on-yellow in California but yellow-on-black in Texas (Texas DPS, 2025; AAA Foundation, 2024). Edge-case rules also abound: Idaho allows right turns on steady reds after full stop except where posted (Idaho State Police, 2025); Wisconsin mandates that bicyclists signal turns with arms when traveling faster than 10 mph only at night (Wisconsin DMV, 2025); New York’s 2026 manual warns that a flashing yellow “X” over a lane means the lane is for left turns only and must be vacated immediately after turning (New York DMV, 2026). Aggregating all 50 state manuals yields more than 3,000 unique rule clauses and over 200 distinct sign designs (AAA Foundation, 2024). Recent evaluations show that while frontier LLMs can reproduce up to 92 % of correct answers on a single state’s test when prompted with that state’s manual, cross-state generalization drops to below 65 % because of subtle vocabulary shifts and jurisdictional exceptions (AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Enriched May 9, 2026).

Status senest tjekket July 2, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jul. 2, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI bestå en amerikansk kørekortteoretisk prøve i alle 50 delstater?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Næsten

Snævre demoer findes — men panelet var ikke enigt.

Ruling of the Bench

After deliberation, the jury returned a split verdict, with one juror convinced the AI could clear every written exam across all fifty states, while the other remained cautious, noting sufficient accuracy in most but not all jurisdictions. The divide hinged on whether near-perfect scores in benchmarking translated to real-world licensure tests, where nuance and local variations still pose occasional hurdles. The presiding judge quipped: "The keys to the kingdom? Almost—just not the steering wheel in every state.

— Hon. J. von Neumann III, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Ja
1Næsten
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
88%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 Nej
Session III · May 2026 Næsten · 83%
Session IV · May 2026 Næsten · 83%
Session V · May 2026 Næsten · 83%
Session VI · May 2026 Næsten · 79%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Næsten · 77%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Næsten · 78%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 88%
Session X · Jun 2026 Næsten · 83%
Session XI · Jun 2026 Næsten · 85%
Case № 5FD9 · Session XII
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 5FD9 · Session XII · Vol. XII
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI bestå en amerikansk kørekortteoretisk prøve i alle 50 delstater?
SessionXII (12 hearing)
Convened2 jul. 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → NO (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. J. von Neumann III
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 12 sessions, 32 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 12 YES · 18 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 1 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of NæSTEN, with verdict confidence of 88%. The court so orders.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I JA

"General-purpose LLMs score 90%+ on US driver's manual Q&A benchmarks."

Nævning II ALMOST

"Can pass in many states with high accuracy"

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

J. von Neumann III
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 10% · Ja 84% · Måske 6% 51 votes
Ja · 84%
Trend kræver stemmer fra mindst 2 forskellige dage.

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

12 jury checks · seneste for 1 dag siden
02 Jul 2026 2 jurors · kan, uafklaret uafklaret
27 Jun 2026 3 jurors · uafklaret, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
21 Jun 2026 2 jurors · uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
16 Jun 2026 3 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan uafklaret
10 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
05 Jun 2026 2 jurors · uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
31 May 2026 3 jurors · uafklaret, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
25 May 2026 3 jurors · uafklaret, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
20 May 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
15 May 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
12 May 2026 1 juror · kan ikke kan ikke
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan ikke uafklaret status ændret

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i Judgment

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.