🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI bestå den amerikanske medicinske licensprøve (USMLE)? — Status tjekket på 20. marts 2024 ?

Hvad mener du?

GPT-4 scorede over den beståede grænse i alle tre trin af United States Medical Licensing Exam. Medicinstuderende lærer nu "hvordan man bruger AI" som en klinisk færdighed.

Background

AI systems have made significant progress in processing and generating human-like language. Passing the USMLE medical licensing exam is a complex task that requires a deep understanding of medical concepts, clinical knowledge, and critical thinking skills. Currently, AI models can assist with certain aspects of medical education, such as providing study materials, practicing questions, and offering feedback, but they are not yet capable of replacing human judgment and expertise in a high-stakes exam like the USMLE. While AI can process vast amounts of medical information, its ability to apply this knowledge in a practical, real-world setting, such as a licensing exam, is still limited. The development of AI systems that can pass the USMLE exam would require significant advancements in areas like natural language understanding, common sense, and decision-making under uncertainty. GPT-4 scored above passing on all three steps of the United States Medical Licensing Exam. Med-schools now teach 'how to use AI' as a clinical skill.

Status senest tjekket June 27, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jun. 27, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI bestå den amerikanske medicinske licensprøve (USMLE)? — Status tjekket på 20. marts 2024

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from Næsten
Ja

Juryen fandt et klart bekræftende svar.

Ruling of the Bench

After thorough deliberation, the jury found the AI capable of passing the United States Medical Licensing Examination, citing multiple instances where models demonstrated high accuracy across all three steps. No dissent lingered in the jury room—the evidence presented left little room for debate. Verdict entered: the stethoscope has gone digital. The gavel falls with this ruling: "A licensed physician it now sits—though still in need of an intern.

— Hon. E. Dijkstra-Patel, Presiding
Jury Tally
2Ja
0Næsten
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
98%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nej
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Næsten · 82%
Session IV · May 2026 Næsten · 78%
Session V · May 2026 Næsten · 83%
Session VI · May 2026 Næsten · 80%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Næsten · 79%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Næsten · 82%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 95%
Session X · Jun 2026 Næsten · 89%
Case № 2418 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 2418 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI bestå den amerikanske medicinske licensprøve (USMLE)? — Status tjekket på 20. marts 2024
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened27 jun. 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. E. Dijkstra-Patel
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 35 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 16 YES · 15 ALMOST · 4 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 2 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 98%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I JA

"AI systems like Med-PaLM 2 and others have demonstrated passing USMLE with high accuracy"

Nævning II JA

"Multiple AI systems, including collaborative models and specific LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok, have demonstrated the ability to pass all three steps of the USMLE with high accuracy."

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

E. Dijkstra-Patel
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 18% · Ja 82% · Måske 0% 110 votes
Nej · 18%
Ja · 82%
Trend kræver stemmer fra mindst 2 forskellige dage.

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

11 jury checks · seneste for 1 dag siden
27 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
22 Jun 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
16 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
11 Jun 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
05 Jun 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
31 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, uafklaret uafklaret
26 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
20 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
15 May 2026 5 jurors · uafklaret, kan, kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
12 May 2026 4 jurors · kan ikke, kan, kan, kan ikke uafklaret status ændret
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke status ændret

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i Judgment

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.