🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI slå verdensmestre i poker ?

Hvad mener du?

AI slog overlegne menneskelige pokerspillere i flerspiller no-limit Texas Hold’em, på trods af bluffing, ufuldstændig information og psykologisk gameplay.

Background

AI defeated elite human poker professionals in multiplayer no-limit Texas Hold’em, despite bluffing, incomplete information, and psychological gameplay.


Current AI systems can beat top human poker professionals in six-player no-limit Texas hold'em. A benchmark called heads-up no-limit hold'em was solved in 2017 by the Pluribus and Libratus programs. In 2019, Pluribus demonstrated superhuman performance in multiplayer settings by defeating several elite players at once, showing that AI can handle the complexity of bluffing, betting, and imperfect information. However, broader variants like ten-player no-limit Texas hold'em or other poker formats remain unsolved. These achievements rely on reinforcement learning and extensive self-play simulations rather than human data.

— Enriched May 11, 2026 · Source: Carnegie Mellon University

Status senest tjekket August 17, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · aug. 17, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI slå verdensmestre i poker?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Ja

Juryen fandt et klart bekræftende svar.

Ruling of the Bench

After considering the decisive performances of systems like Pluribus and DeepStack against elite human opposition, the jury found that artificial cognition has truly mastered the art of bluffing under uncertainty, leaving no doubt about its supremacy at the table. While some worried about the absence of human tears on the felt, the overwhelming evidence of repeated victories settled the matter without need for further deliberation. "The cards are in its hands—case closed.

— Hon. E. Dijkstra-Patel, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Ja
0Næsten
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
100%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Ja
Session II · May 2026 Ja
Session III · May 2026 Ja · 89%
Session IV · May 2026 Ja · 77%
Session V · May 2026 Ja · 80%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Ja · 85%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Ja · 80%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Ja · 85%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 97%
Session X · Jun 2026 Ja · 100%
Session XI · Jun 2026 Ja · 93%
Session XII · Jul 2026 Ja · 98%
Session XIII · Jul 2026 Ja · 100%
Session XIV · Jul 2026 Ja · 100%
Session XV · Jul 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XVI · Jul 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XVII · Aug 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XVIII · Aug 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XIX · Aug 2026 Ja · 97%
Case № 057B · Session XX
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 057B · Session XX · Vol. XX
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI slå verdensmestre i poker?
SessionXX (20 hearing)
Convened17 aug. 2026
Previously ruledYES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Aug '26) → YES (Aug '26) → YES (Aug '26) → YES (Aug '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. E. Dijkstra-Patel
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 20 sessions, 48 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 48 YES · 0 ALMOST · 0 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 100%. The court so orders.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I JA

"AI defeated top humans in no-limit Texas Hold'em, e.g., Pluribus and DeepStack."

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

E. Dijkstra-Patel
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 22% · Ja 74% · Måske 4% 23 votes
Nej · 22%
Ja · 74%
41 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

20 jury checks · seneste for 1 dag siden
17 Aug 2026 1 juror · kan kan
12 Aug 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
07 Aug 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
01 Aug 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
27 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
21 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
16 Jul 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
10 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
05 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
30 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
24 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
19 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
13 Jun 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan kan
08 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
03 Jun 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan kan
28 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
23 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
17 May 2026 5 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan, kan kan
14 May 2026 5 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan, kan kan
11 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i Judgment

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.