🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI solve graduate-level math problems in many domains ?

What do you think?

How can AI assist in tackling graduate-level mathematical challenges spanning multiple domains? The current landscape suggests both promise and limitations in automated problem-solving across fields like combinatorics, abstract algebra, and real analysis.

Background

AI systems have made significant progress in solving graduate-level math problems, particularly with the development of deep learning and machine learning algorithms. These systems can now solve complex problems in various domains, such as algebra, geometry, and calculus, often with a high degree of accuracy. However, their ability to solve problems across many domains is still limited, and they often require significant training data and computational resources to achieve good results. While AI systems are not yet capable of fully replacing human mathematicians, they can be useful tools for assisting with certain types of mathematical problems.

Status last checked on June 27, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Jun 27, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI solve graduate-level math problems in many domains?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Yes

The jury found a clear answer in the affirmative.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found that today's leading systems already navigate graduate-level mathematics with confidence, solving problems across domains when equipped with the right tools and training data. While gaps remain in pure, novel conjecture, the consensus was clear: the bar is not just met, it's been cleared by several lengths. There was no quarrel, only admiration for how far the field has advanced. Ruling: "The chalk dust still lingers—AI has already inscribed the proof.

— Hon. A. Turing-Brown, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Yes
0Almost
0No
Verdict Confidence
98%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Yes
Session II · May 2026 Yes
Session III · May 2026 Almost · 83%
Session IV · May 2026 Almost · 77%
Session V · May 2026 Almost · 84%
Session VI · May 2026 Yes · 82%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Almost · 78%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Yes · 82%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Yes · 98%
Session X · Jun 2026 Yes · 98%
Case № 4DE2 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 4DE2 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI solve graduate-level math problems in many domains?
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened27 Jun 2026
Previously ruledYES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. A. Turing-Brown
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 28 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 16 YES · 12 ALMOST · 0 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of YES, with verdict confidence of 98%. The court so orders.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I YES

"Graduate-level math problems are routinely solved by advanced AI systems like AlphaGeometry and DeepMind's math models."

A. Turing-Brown
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 5% · Yes 92% · Maybe 3% 188 votes
Yes · 92%
Trend needs votes from at least 2 different days.

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

11 jury checks · most recent 1 day ago
27 Jun 2026 1 juror · can can
22 Jun 2026 1 juror · can can
16 Jun 2026 1 juror · can can
11 Jun 2026 3 jurors · can, can, undecided undecided
05 Jun 2026 3 jurors · can, undecided, undecided undecided
31 May 2026 3 jurors · can, can, undecided undecided
26 May 2026 5 jurors · can, can, undecided, undecided, undecided undecided
20 May 2026 2 jurors · undecided, undecided undecided
15 May 2026 4 jurors · undecided, can, undecided, undecided undecided status changed
12 May 2026 3 jurors · can, can, can can
11 May 2026 2 jurors · can, can can

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Judgment

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.