🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI solve a rubik's cube in under a second with a robot ?

What do you think?

What does it mean to ‘solve a Rubik’s cube in under a second with a robot?’ It refers to fully automated systems that identify the scrambled state, plan an optimal sequence of moves, and execute them with such precision and speed that the entire process takes less than one second. Curious how engineers pushed robots past this milestone?

Background

Robots have been able to solve a Rubik's cube in under a second. The current Guinness World Records holder, set on March 6, 2024 in Berlin, Germany, is a robot that solved the cube in 0.38 seconds (Cube Solver Robot, Mitsubishi Electric). This was achieved through the use of high-speed cameras, advanced algorithms, and precise robotic arms. The robot is able to quickly analyze the cube's configuration and then execute a series of precise movements to solve it. Prior to this record, the previous fastest robot solved the cube in 0.637 seconds in 2018 at the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots in Beijing, China. The development of such robots has pushed the boundaries of what is possible in terms of speed and dexterity in robotics. Specialised hardware crossed the half-second mark in 2018.

Status last checked on August 9, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Aug 9, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI solve a rubik's cube in under a second with a robot?

★ The Court Finds ★
▼ Downgraded from Yes
Almost

Narrow demos exist — but the panel was not unanimous.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found the robot valiantly close but not quite world-record-level perfect, with one juror insisting it already crosses the finish line and another pointing to the occasional stumble under real-world chaos. A lone holdout still insists a Rubik’s Cube solved in under a second is just another Friday in a lab. The final ruling: "The clock stops at .99 seconds, and the world keeps turning.

— Hon. M. Lovelace, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Yes
1Almost
0No
Verdict Confidence
93%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Yes · 85%
Session IV · May 2026 Yes · 86%
Session V · May 2026 Yes · 88%
Session VI · May 2026 Yes · 82%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Yes · 80%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Yes · 79%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Yes · 83%
Session X · Jun 2026 Yes · 99%
Session XI · Jun 2026 Yes · 94%
Session XII · Jul 2026 Yes · 93%
Session XIII · Jul 2026 Yes · 98%
Session XIV · Jul 2026 Yes · 93%
Session XV · Jul 2026 Yes · 100%
Session XVI · Jul 2026 Yes · 90%
Session XVII · Jul 2026 Yes · 95%
Session XVIII · Aug 2026 Yes · 90%
Case № 0ABD · Session XIX
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 0ABD · Session XIX · Vol. XIX
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI solve a rubik's cube in under a second with a robot?
SessionXIX (19 hearing)
Convened9 Aug 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Aug '26) → ALMOST (Aug '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. M. Lovelace
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 19 sessions, 48 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 44 YES · 2 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 1 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of ALMOST, with verdict confidence of 93%. The court so orders. Verdict downgraded from prior session.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I YES

"AI-optimized algorithms exist"

Juror II ALMOST

"Robotics with closed-loop control solves cubes in <1s but not reliably in all conditions"

M. Lovelace
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 16% · Yes 72% · Maybe 12% 216 votes
No · 16%
Yes · 72%
Maybe · 12%
Trend needs votes from at least 2 different days.

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

19 jury checks · most recent 3 days ago
09 Aug 2026 2 jurors · can, undecided undecided
03 Aug 2026 1 juror · can can
29 Jul 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
23 Jul 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
18 Jul 2026 1 juror · can can
13 Jul 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
07 Jul 2026 1 juror · can can
02 Jul 2026 4 jurors · can, can, can, can can
26 Jun 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
21 Jun 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
16 Jun 2026 3 jurors · can, can, can can
10 Jun 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
05 Jun 2026 2 jurors · can, can can
30 May 2026 3 jurors · can, can, can can
25 May 2026 5 jurors · can, can, can, can, can can
20 May 2026 5 jurors · can, undecided, can, can, can undecided
15 May 2026 4 jurors · can, can, can, can can status changed
12 May 2026 3 jurors · can, cannot, can undecided
11 May 2026 2 jurors · can, cannot undecided status changed

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Physical

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.