Can AI invent a new coded form of communication that only 2 people can understand ?
Cast your vote — then read what our editor and the AI models found.
AI can generate customized ciphers and shared-secret dialogue tools, but these are not secret in the cryptographic sense unless they combine a newly invented cipher with modern encryption and a pre-shared key; otherwise they remain “security through obscurity” and cannot be said to create a provably private channel two people can exclusively understand. Current large language models can certainly invent novel codes and encoding schemes for toy or educational use, yet they do not enable truly secure, future-proof communication without applying established cryptographic standards.
— Enriched May 13, 2026 · Source: best-effort summary, no public reference
Today’s AI systems can generate unique ciphers or coded communication protocols based on textual instructions, but they do not independently ensure that only two specific individuals can use or decode them in practice. Generative models like LLM chatbots can propose private key–style substitution rules, keyword triggers, or context-dependent encoding schemes tailored to a user’s scenario, yet the security of such systems depends entirely on assumptions about shared secrets, external encryption, or physical access control rather than inherent AI capabilities. As of mid-2024 no public AI system has demonstrated the ability to generate and deploy a truly secure, practical cipher whose meaning is comprehensible exclusively to two designated parties without relying on additional cryptographic infrastructure.
— Enriched May 13, 2026 · Source: best-effort summary, no public reference
Suggest a tag
A missing concept on this topic? Suggest it and admin reviews.
Status last checked on May 13, 2026.
Gallery
Disagree? Post your comment below.
What the audience thinks
No 0% · Yes 100% · Maybe 0% 2 votesDiscussion
no comments⚖ 1 jury check · most recent 7 hours ago
Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.