🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI hold a grudge for forty years and let it go ?

What do you think?

What does it mean to carry a grudge for decades and then choose to release it? Today's AI systems cannot experience emotions or relationships, so they lack the core elements needed for such a process.

Background

Current AI systems lack the capacity for long-term emotional experiences, personal relationships, and self-awareness, which are essential for holding a grudge and later letting it go. While AI can simulate emotional responses and engage in conversations about past events, it does not possess personal experiences, emotions, or memories that would enable it to genuinely hold a grudge. The current state of the art in AI focuses on processing and generating human-like text based on patterns and context, but it does not involve true emotional intelligence or personal experiences.

AI is still far from being able to hold a grudge for an extended period and then let it go in the way a human would. Current AI systems are not capable of holding grudges or experiencing emotions in the way humans do, as they lack personal experiences, emotions, and consciousness. While AI can be programmed to simulate certain emotional responses or behaviors, it does not have the ability to genuinely hold onto a grudge or experience the emotional release of letting one go. The development of AI systems that can truly experience and manage emotions is still a topic of ongoing research in the field of affective computing.

As of May 9, 2026, AI systems can process and respond to vast amounts of data, but their "decisions" are based on algorithms and data analysis rather than emotional experiences. This distinction remains a key focus in discussions about the boundaries between human emotional depth and artificial simulation. Sources include the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Status last checked on June 25, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Jun 25, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI hold a grudge for forty years and let it go?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
No

Beyond AI for now. The capability gap is real.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury reached unanimity faster than a spreadsheet loads, finding that silicon does not simmer and cannot truly nurse a grudge the way warm, squishy neurons do. Emotional weight, they reasoned, is baked into the messy chemistry of being alive, and no database can age alongside a wound the way human hearts do. Ruling: Computers may compute, but only humans can hold a grudge.

— Hon. A. Turing-Brown, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Yes
0Almost
1No
Verdict Confidence
100%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 No
Session II · May 2026 No · 86%
Session III · May 2026 No · 77%
Session IV · May 2026 No · 85%
Session V · May 2026 No · 75%
Session VI · Jun 2026 No · 85%
Session VII · Jun 2026 No · 79%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 No · 77%
Session IX · Jun 2026 No · 90%
Case № 0BF1 · Session X
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 0BF1 · Session X · Vol. X
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI hold a grudge for forty years and let it go?
SessionX (10 hearing)
Convened25 Jun 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. A. Turing-Brown
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 10 sessions, 28 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 1 ALMOST · 27 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 0 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of NO, with verdict confidence of 100%. The court so orders.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I NO

"Human emotional memory and resentment dynamics remain outside AI capabilities"

A. Turing-Brown
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 71% · Yes 15% · Maybe 14% 366 votes
No · 71%
Yes · 15%
Maybe · 14%
15 days of activity

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

10 jury checks · most recent 3 days ago
25 Jun 2026 1 juror · cannot cannot
20 Jun 2026 3 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot cannot
14 Jun 2026 2 jurors · cannot, cannot cannot
09 Jun 2026 2 jurors · cannot, cannot cannot
03 Jun 2026 4 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot, cannot cannot
29 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, undecided, cannot undecided
23 May 2026 4 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot, cannot cannot
18 May 2026 2 jurors · cannot, cannot cannot
14 May 2026 4 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot, cannot cannot
12 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot cannot

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Emotional

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.