🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI determine where i am in 10 yes or no questions ?

What do you think?

The user is asking whether a classic guessing game—narrowing down a location with ten yes-or-no questions—can actually succeed. While the game is intuitive, the mechanics of real-world geolocation raise questions about feasibility. We’ll examine what such a strategy would realistically entail.

Background

AI systems can generate yes/no strategies for approximating a person’s location, but achieving global, real-time accuracy with only ten questions remains beyond the reach of today’s open-source tools. Practically, any such game operates on a pre-filtered set of candidate locations rather than discovering coordinates from scratch. Systems typically begin with coarse geolocation databases (e.g., IP-to-region mappings, language inference, known Wi-Fi SSID clusters) to shrink the search space to hundreds or thousands of possibilities before the conversation even starts. From that point, yes/no questions may further winnow the list, but the initial coarse filter is indispensable; without it, the number of viable candidates would remain far too large to exhaust in ten questions. Commercial assistants (e.g., voice-activated smart speakers) prioritize fast, low-cognitive-load interactions over minimizing question counts, so their implementations may spare users the full ten-question sequence even when a precise answer is required. These trade-offs between speed, robustness, and question economy highlight why the “ten-question” figure is best understood as a heuristic for ranking small candidate sets rather than a universal discovery protocol.

Status last checked on June 27, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Jun 27, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI determine where i am in 10 yes or no questions?

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from No
Yes

The jury found a clear answer in the affirmative.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found the task feasible through clever triangulation—each “yes” or “no” can be repurposed like an algorithmic lens, bending signals from towers and timestamps into a pinpoint on the map. Yet one juror remained unconvinced, insisting no ten-question grid could outmaneuver the chaos of a mobile signal or VPN reroute. Verdict: the method works often enough to stand.

— Hon. M. Lovelace, Presiding
Jury Tally
2Yes
0Almost
1No
Verdict Confidence
92%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 Yes · 86%
Session III · May 2026 Yes · 85%
Session IV · May 2026 Yes · 82%
Session V · May 2026 Yes · 83%
Session VI · Jun 2026 In_research · 79%
Session VII · Jun 2026 In_research · 79%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Yes · 83%
Session IX · Jun 2026 No · 90%
Case № 1F0B · Session X
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 1F0B · Session X · Vol. X
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI determine where i am in 10 yes or no questions?
SessionX (10 hearing)
Convened27 Jun 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. M. Lovelace
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 10 sessions, 28 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 19 YES · 1 ALMOST · 8 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 2 — 0 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of YES, with verdict confidence of 92%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I YES

"Geolocation via IP or cell tower"

Juror II NO

"Determining a user's exact location with 10 yes/no questions is not technically feasible today"

Juror III YES

"Geolocation via IP or cell tower triangulation"

M. Lovelace
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 52% · Yes 39% · Maybe 9% 23 votes
No · 52%
Yes · 39%
58 days of activity

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

10 jury checks · most recent 1 day ago
27 Jun 2026 3 jurors · can, cannot, can undecided
21 Jun 2026 1 juror · cannot cannot
16 Jun 2026 3 jurors · cannot, can, can undecided
10 Jun 2026 2 jurors · cannot, can undecided
05 Jun 2026 2 jurors · cannot, can undecided status changed
30 May 2026 4 jurors · can, cannot, can, can undecided
25 May 2026 3 jurors · can, can, can can status changed
20 May 2026 4 jurors · can, undecided, can, can undecided
15 May 2026 4 jurors · can, cannot, can, can undecided
11 May 2026 2 jurors · can, cannot undecided status changed

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Creative

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.