🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI create a virtual reality experience that simulates the sensation of smell and taste in a realistic way, allowing users to explore and interact with virtual environments in a more immersive way ?

What do you think?

What would it take to make virtual reality as rich as full physical immersion? One path is adding smell and taste to sight and sound, but how close are we to a system that can recreate every sense under software control? The inquiry goes beyond visuals and audio to the chemical signals that shape perception itself.

Background

Virtual reality (VR) systems simulate visual and auditory environments with increasing realism, yet smell and taste remain largely unaddressed. Current VR relies on external scent-emitting devices and simple olfactory displays, while taste simulation is still at an exploratory stage. Research into digital olfaction and gustation uses chemical sensors and machine learning to map odors and flavors to user inputs, but these technologies are not yet integrated into mainstream VR hardware. A 2026 survey by IEEE notes that scent-emitting devices and electronic tongues exist, yet they lack the fidelity and latency required for seamless immersion. Gustatory feedback, in particular, remains underdeveloped due to the complexity of taste receptors and the need for safe, controllable chemical delivery. Challenges include odorant cross-contamination, safety of aerosolized chemicals, and the subjective nature of sensory perception. Commercial products such as Feelreal’s scent modules or Aromajoin’s olfactory devices offer limited, predefined scent palettes rather than dynamic, AI-driven experiences. As of May 2026, a fully immersive VR system capable of generating realistic, on-demand smell and taste remains beyond current technological and biological understanding.

Status last checked on June 26, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · Jun 26, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI create a virtual reality experience that simulates the sensation of smell and taste in a realistic way, allowing users to explore and interact with virtual environments in a more immersive way?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
In Research

The jury could not deliver a verdict on the evidence presented.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury took a cautious path down the olfactory garden path, conceding that hints of floral bouquet and citrus tang can already waft through the wires, but the full feast of flavor and fragrance remains tantalizingly out of reach. The lone ALMOST vote tried to savor the early prototypes, while the NO juror insisted the banquet hall is still dark and empty, with only stubbed toes to show for the search. Ruling: “Sniff the future, but don’t call dinner served.”

— Hon. G. Hopper, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Yes
1Almost
1No
Verdict Confidence
89%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 No
Session II · May 2026 In_research · 83%
Session III · May 2026 In_research · 83%
Session IV · May 2026 Almost · 83%
Session V · May 2026 Almost · 79%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Almost · 80%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Almost · 78%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Almost · 78%
Session IX · Jun 2026 In_research · 88%
Case № 3754 · Session X
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 3754 · Session X · Vol. X
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI create a virtual reality experience that simulates the sensation of smell and taste in a realistic way, allowing users to explore and interact with virtual environments in a more immersive way?
SessionX (10 hearing)
Convened26 Jun 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. G. Hopper
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 10 sessions, 33 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 18 ALMOST · 15 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 1 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of IN RESEARCH, with verdict confidence of 89%. The court so orders.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I ALMOST

"Simulating smell and taste is partially possible"

Juror II NO

"No AI system has demonstrated realistic simultaneous smell and taste simulation in VR."

G. Hopper
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 54% · Yes 35% · Maybe 12% 26 votes
No · 54%
Yes · 35%
Maybe · 12%
15 days of activity

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

10 jury checks · most recent 2 days ago
26 Jun 2026 2 jurors · undecided, cannot undecided
20 Jun 2026 2 jurors · undecided, cannot undecided
15 Jun 2026 3 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided undecided
09 Jun 2026 3 jurors · undecided, cannot, undecided undecided
04 Jun 2026 3 jurors · undecided, cannot, undecided undecided
30 May 2026 4 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided, undecided undecided
24 May 2026 5 jurors · undecided, cannot, cannot, undecided, undecided undecided
19 May 2026 4 jurors · undecided, cannot, cannot, undecided undecided
15 May 2026 4 jurors · undecided, cannot, cannot, undecided undecided status changed
12 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, cannot, cannot cannot

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in Sensory

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.