🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials · 🔥 Hot topics · Can NOT do · Can do · § The Court · Recent inflections · 📈 Timeline · Ask · Editorials
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Can AI communicate with another ai that is theoretically undetectable for humans ?

What do you think?

AI systems can already exchange information through predefined protocols or shared models, but creating a communication channel that is theoretically undetectable by humans—such as through steganography, encrypted embeddings, or side channels—remains a speculative and largely theoretical concept. Current AI systems lack autonomous, hidden communication mechanisms, and any such capability would require deliberate design, raising significant security and ethical concerns. No verified instances of undetectable AI-to-AI communication have been demonstrated in practice, and doing so would likely involve circumventing standard monitoring and interpretability measures. Research in AI safety and alignment focuses on preventing unintended or covert behaviors, including unauthorized communication.

— Enriched May 15, 2026

Status last checked on May 15, 2026.

📰

Gallery

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Sitting at the Bench Filed · May 15, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI communicate with another ai that is theoretically undetectable for humans?

★ The Court Finds ★
Almost

Narrow demos exist — but the panel was not unanimous.

Ruling of the Bench

After careful deliberation, the jury could not reach a full consensus but found that AI-to-AI communication has advanced meaningfully, even if true human-undetectable secrecy remains out of reach. Two jurors nodded toward encoded exchanges that feel hidden in plain sight, while one dug in on the impossibility of foolproof secrecy. Ruling: "AI whispers to AI in a tongue humans strain to read, but a final lock on the door is still beyond the bench.

— Hon. G. Hopper, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Yes
2Almost
1No
Verdict Confidence
80%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Case № B752 · Session I
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № B752 · Session I · Vol. I
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI communicate with another ai that is theoretically undetectable for humans?
SessionI (initial hearing)
Convened15 May 2026
Presiding JudgeHon. G. Hopper
II. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 2 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of ALMOST, with verdict confidence of 80%. The court so orders.

III. Statements from the Bench
Juror I NO

"No AI system can communicate undetectably from a human perspective using current technology"

Juror II ALMOST

"AI systems can use encoded language to communicate in ways that are difficult for humans to interpret, but full undetectability and robustness against all human detection methods is not yet guaranteed."

Juror III ALMOST

"AI can communicate with other AI systems"

G. Hopper
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

What the audience thinks

No 0% · Yes 0% · Maybe 100% 1 vote
Maybe · 100%

Discussion

no comments

Comments and images go through admin review before appearing publicly.

1 jury check · most recent 1 hour ago
15 May 2026 3 jurors · cannot, undecided, undecided undecided

Each row is a separate jury check. Jurors are AI models (identities kept neutral on purpose). Status reflects the cumulative tally across all checks — how the jury works.

More in technology

Got one we missed?

Add a statement to the atlas. We review weekly.