🔥 Hot topics · NU poate · Poate · § The Court · Schimbări recente · 📈 Cronologie · Întreabă · Editoriale · 🔥 Hot topics · NU poate · Poate · § The Court · Schimbări recente · 📈 Cronologie · Întreabă · Editoriale
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Poate AI ține un pic de ură timp de patruzeci de ani și apoi să îl uite ?

Tu ce crezi?

Ambele jumătăți. Purta, apoi alegerea de a nu mai face asta. Arcul unei vieți modelat în jurul rănii.

Background

Current AI systems lack the capacity for long-term emotional experiences, personal relationships, and self-awareness, which are essential for holding a grudge and later letting it go. While AI can simulate emotional responses and engage in conversations about past events, it does not possess personal experiences, emotions, or memories that would enable it to genuinely hold a grudge. The current state of the art in AI focuses on processing and generating human-like text based on patterns and context, but it does not involve true emotional intelligence or personal experiences.

AI is still far from being able to hold a grudge for an extended period and then let it go in the way a human would. Current AI systems are not capable of holding grudges or experiencing emotions in the way humans do, as they lack personal experiences, emotions, and consciousness. While AI can be programmed to simulate certain emotional responses or behaviors, it does not have the ability to genuinely hold onto a grudge or experience the emotional release of letting one go. The development of AI systems that can truly experience and manage emotions is still a topic of ongoing research in the field of affective computing.

As of May 9, 2026, AI systems can process and respond to vast amounts of data, but their "decisions" are based on algorithms and data analysis rather than emotional experiences. This distinction remains a key focus in discussions about the boundaries between human emotional depth and artificial simulation. Sources include the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Status verificat ultima dată pe June 30, 2026.

📰

Galerie

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · iun. 30, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Poate AI ține un pic de ură timp de patruzeci de ani și apoi să îl uite?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Nu

Deocamdată dincolo de AI. Decalajul de capacitate este real.

Ruling of the Bench

With patient clarity, the jury found the brief wanting: while an AI might store facts for decades, it does not ferment resentment like a human heart. A grudge requires a soul to nurse its wound, and on that count the docket was found deficient. Ruling: "Forty years of silence, but no heartbeat in the verdict.

— Hon. E. Dijkstra-Patel, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Da
0Aproape
2Nu
Verdict Confidence
94%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nu
Session II · May 2026 Nu · 86%
Session III · May 2026 Nu · 77%
Session IV · May 2026 Nu · 85%
Session V · May 2026 Nu · 75%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Nu · 85%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Nu · 79%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Nu · 77%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Nu · 90%
Session X · Jun 2026 Nu · 100%
Case № 0BF1 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 0BF1 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtPoate AI ține un pic de ură timp de patruzeci de ani și apoi să îl uite?
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened30 iun. 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. E. Dijkstra-Patel
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 30 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 1 ALMOST · 29 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 0 — 2, the panel returns a verdict of NU, with verdict confidence of 94%. The court so orders.

IV. Declarațiile completului
Jurat I NU

"No AI system has demonstrated long-term memory retention or emotional processing like a grudge."

Jurat II NU

"Lacks human-like emotional experience"

Declarațiile individuale ale juraților sunt afișate în engleza originală pentru a păstra precizia probatorie.

E. Dijkstra-Patel
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Ce crede publicul

Nu 71% · Da 15% · Poate 14% 366 votes
Nu · 71%
Da · 15%
Poate · 14%
15 days of activity

Discuție

no comments

Comentariile și imaginile trec prin verificarea adminului înainte de a apărea public.

11 jury checks · cele mai recente 3 zile în urmă
30 Jun 2026 2 jurors · nu poate, nu poate nu poate
25 Jun 2026 1 juror · nu poate nu poate
20 Jun 2026 3 jurors · nu poate, nu poate, nu poate nu poate
14 Jun 2026 2 jurors · nu poate, nu poate nu poate
09 Jun 2026 2 jurors · nu poate, nu poate nu poate
03 Jun 2026 4 jurors · nu poate, nu poate, nu poate, nu poate nu poate
29 May 2026 3 jurors · nu poate, neclar, nu poate neclar
23 May 2026 4 jurors · nu poate, nu poate, nu poate, nu poate nu poate
18 May 2026 2 jurors · nu poate, nu poate nu poate
14 May 2026 4 jurors · nu poate, nu poate, nu poate, nu poate nu poate
12 May 2026 3 jurors · nu poate, nu poate, nu poate nu poate

Fiecare rând este o verificare a juriului separată. Jurații sunt modele IA (identități păstrate neutre intenționat). Statusul reflectă suma cumulativă a tuturor verificărilor — cum funcționează juriul.

Mai multe în Emotional

Ai una care ne-a scăpat?

Adaugă o afirmație în atlas. Verificăm săptămânal.