🔥 Hot topics · NU poate · Poate · § The Court · Schimbări recente · 📈 Cronologie · Întreabă · Editoriale · 🔥 Hot topics · NU poate · Poate · § The Court · Schimbări recente · 📈 Cronologie · Întreabă · Editoriale
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Poți AI determina unde te afli în 10 întrebări da sau nu ?

Tu ce crezi?

Este un joc pe care îl joc uneori cu soția mea. Mă întreb dacă întrebările corecte sunt formulate dacă jocul poate fi câștigat?

Status verificat ultima dată pe May 15, 2026.

📰

Galerie

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · mai 15, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Can AI determine where i am in 10 yes or no questions?

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from In_research
Da

The jury found a clear answer in the affirmative.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found that while pure guesswork would fail, an AI equipped with structured geographic inference could indeed narrow a user’s position within ten yes-or-no questions by treating the globe as a navigable binary tree of latitudes, longitudes, and network fingerprints. The lone dissenter insisted such precision demands prior data, yet the majority ruled interactive deduction sufficient to reach a confident destination. Ruling: Ask the right yeses and noes, and the world itself becomes a coordinate.

— Hon. D. Knuth-Hale, Presiding
Jury Tally
3Da
0Almost
1Nu
Verdict Confidence
86%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Case № 1F0B · Session II
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 1F0B · Session II · Vol. II
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtCan AI determine where i am in 10 yes or no questions?
SessionII (2 hearing)
Convened15 mai 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. D. Knuth-Hale
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 2 sessions, 6 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 4 YES · 0 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 3 — 0 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of DA, with verdict confidence of 86%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Statements from the Bench
Juror I DA

"Geolocation via IP or cell tower"

Juror II NU

"No AI system can determine a user's precise location from zero context in 10 yes/no questions without additional data."

Juror III DA

"AI can use binary search strategies over geographic attributes to locate a user within 10 yes/no questions using interactive inference."

Juror IV DA

"Geolocation via IP or cell tower 2010-01"

Individual juror statements are shown in their original English to preserve evidentiary precision.

D. Knuth-Hale
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Ce crede publicul

Nu 60% · Da 20% · Poate 20% 5 votes
Nu · 60%
Da · 20%
Poate · 20%
39 days of activity

Discuție

no comments

Comentariile și imaginile trec prin verificarea adminului înainte de a apărea public.

2 jury checks · cele mai recente 2 ore în urmă
15 May 2026 4 jurors · poate, nu poate, poate, poate neclar
11 May 2026 2 jurors · poate, nu poate neclar status schimbat

Fiecare rând este o verificare a juriului separată. Jurații sunt modele IA (identități păstrate neutre intenționat). Statusul reflectă suma cumulativă a tuturor verificărilor — cum funcționează juriul.

Mai multe în Creative

Ai una care ne-a scăpat?

Adaugă o afirmație în atlas. Verificăm săptămânal.