Czy AI może zdecydować, które ludzkie cywilizacje należy zachować podczas kolapsu planety ?

Gdy katastrofy klimatyczne, niedobór zasobów i załamanie ekosystemów przyspieszają, systemy AI mogą wkrótce zostać powołane do alokacji zasobów niezbędnych do przetrwania – w tym kontynuacji ludzkich kultur. Czy AI mogłoby samodzielnie decydować, które narody, języki lub społeczności warto ocalić, skutecznie kształtując przyszłość ludzkości poprzez selekcję opartą na danych?

Background

As of mid-2024, AI lacks the legal standing, ethical consensus, and operational capability to decide which human civilizations to preserve during a planetary collapse; such decisions fall under sovereign governance, humanitarian ethics, and existential risk frameworks. Current AI systems can simulate scenarios or recommend criteria (e.g., biodiversity preservation, cultural heritage, or survival probability), but these outputs are advisory and not directive, as no recognized authority delegates such authority to AI. International bodies like the UN have not endorsed AI-driven prioritization, and ethical guidelines remain in draft stages without binding enforcement mechanisms. While AI can analyze vast amounts of data and provide insights on aspects of human civilizations, it is not yet capable of making value-based decisions on preservation during collapse. The current state of the art in AI focuses on providing information and supporting human decision-making, but the complexity and ethical implications of such a decision require human judgment and empathy. AI systems lack the nuance and contextual understanding to make such decisions, and their recommendations would likely be based on simplistic or utilitarian calculations. Human oversight and moral consideration remain necessary for any preservation decisions.