🔥 Hot topics · Kan dit NIET · Kan dit · § The Court · Recente omslagen · 📈 Tijdlijn · Vraag · Redactionele stukken · 🔥 Hot topics · Kan dit NIET · Kan dit · § The Court · Recente omslagen · 📈 Tijdlijn · Vraag · Redactionele stukken
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI een prothese ontwerpen die bestuurd kan worden door iemands gedachten en spiersignalen ?

Wat denk je?

Prothetische ledematen zijn de afgelopen jaren aanzienlijk verbeterd, maar het besturen ervan kan nog steeds een uitdaging zijn. Vooruitgang in hersen-computerinterfaces en machine learning kunnen hierbij helpen.

Background

Prosthetic limbs have improved significantly in recent years, but controlling them can still be a challenge. Advances in brain-computer interfaces and machine learning can help.

Researchers have made significant progress in developing prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by a person's thoughts and muscle signals, using advanced technologies such as electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). These prosthetics can decode brain signals and muscle activity, allowing individuals to control the movement of the prosthetic limb with a high degree of precision. Current systems often rely on invasive or partially invasive methods, such as implanting electrodes in the brain or muscles, but non-invasive methods are also being explored. The development of these thought-controlled prosthetics has the potential to greatly improve the quality of life for individuals with amputations or other motor disorders.— Enriched May 9, 2026 · Source: National Institutes of Health

Recent advancements in brain-computer interfaces and machine learning have enabled the development of prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by a person's thoughts and muscle signals. For example, models like the DEKA Arm System and the MindControl system have been successfully tested, allowing individuals to control prosthetic limbs with high precision. These systems use electromyography and electroencephalography signals to decode the user's intentions and translate them into prosthetic movements. While there is still room for improvement, AI-powered prosthetic limbs have made significant progress in recent years.— Inflection set by admin on May 9, 2026. Source: DEKA Arm System (DEKA Research & Development Corp.), 2022.

Status voor het laatst gecontroleerd op June 28, 2026.

📰

Galerie

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jun. 28, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI een prothese ontwerpen die bestuurd kan worden door iemands gedachten en spiersignalen?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Ja

De jury kwam tot een duidelijk bevestigend antwoord.

Ruling of the Bench

After careful deliberation, the jury found the evidence persuasive that AI has achieved the precision and adaptability needed to translate thoughts and muscle signals into meaningful prosthetic movement. They noted breakthroughs in real-time signal decoding and adaptive learning systems as decisive factors in their unanimous vote. One juror, a rehabilitation specialist, remarked that the technology now offers users a level of control once thought impossible. Ruling: The mind speaks, the limb obeys — and justice for seamless motion is served.

— Hon. B. Liskov-Chen, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Ja
0Bijna
0Nee
Verdict Confidence
95%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Ja · 85%
Session IV · May 2026 Bijna · 81%
Session V · May 2026 Bijna · 73%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Bijna · 78%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Bijna · 77%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Ja · 80%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 95%
Session X · Jun 2026 Ja · 77%
Case № 8184 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 8184 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI een prothese ontwerpen die bestuurd kan worden door iemands gedachten en spiersignalen?
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened28 jun. 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. B. Liskov-Chen
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 27 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 15 YES · 10 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 95%. The court so orders.

IV. Verklaringen van het college
Jurylid I JA

"AI-driven neural interfaces and signal processing enable prosthetic control via thought and muscle signals."

Individuele juryverklaringen worden in het oorspronkelijke Engels weergegeven om de bewijsprecisie te behouden.

B. Liskov-Chen
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Wat het publiek denkt

Nee 46% · Ja 42% · Misschien 12% 26 votes
Nee · 46%
Ja · 42%
Misschien · 12%
15 days of activity

Discussie

no comments

Opmerkingen en afbeeldingen gaan door een beoordeling door de beheerder voordat ze publiek verschijnen.

11 jury checks · meest recent 3 uur geleden
28 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
23 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
17 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
12 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, onbeslist onbeslist
06 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, onbeslist onbeslist
01 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, onbeslist, onbeslist onbeslist
27 May 2026 2 jurors · onbeslist, onbeslist onbeslist
21 May 2026 4 jurors · onbeslist, kan, onbeslist, onbeslist onbeslist
16 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, onbeslist onbeslist
13 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan niet, kan onbeslist
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan niet onbeslist status gewijzigd

Elke rij is een afzonderlijke jurycontrole. Juryleden zijn AI-modellen (identiteiten bewust neutraal gehouden). Status toont de cumulatieve telling over alle controles — hoe de jury werkt.

Meer in Physical

Hebben we er één gemist?

We review weekly.