Stuff AI CAN'T Do

¿Puede una IA controlar un brazo robótico para seguir una receta de cocina en una cocina controlada ?

¿Qué opinas?

Los modelos RT-2 y sucesores de DeepMind demostraron que los modelos de visión-lenguaje-acción de extremo a extremo pueden seguir una receta con errores mayormente dentro del rango humano.

Background

DeepMind's RT-2 and its successors demonstrated that end-to-end vision-language-action models are capable of executing multi-step cooking instructions with error rates approaching human performance in controlled environments. AI-powered robotic arms have been successfully deployed to follow structured recipes in controlled kitchens, utilizing integrated sensors and machine learning systems to adapt to ingredient variations and task nuances. Research prototypes and commercial deployments alike leverage pre-programmed high-level recipes mapped to low-level motor actions, often constrained by lighting, spatial layout, and standardized ingredient presentation to ensure repeatable outcomes. Studies published by IEEE highlight that such systems reliably operate in commercial or assistive settings, where consistency and repeatability outweigh the need for full culinary creativity. These platforms typically combine real-time visual feedback, force sensing, and semantic reasoning to map verbal or written recipes (e.g., "chop onion," "whisk egg") into executable arm trajectories. While current implementations dominate structured environments—such as prep stations in food manufacturing or assistive cooking platforms for individuals with motor impairments—they remain sensitive to deviations in ingredient shape, color, or placement. This underscores ongoing work in robust perception and adaptive control to generalize recipe execution beyond idealized conditions.

Estado verificado por última vez en June 27, 2026.

📰

Galería

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jun. 27, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

¿Puede una IA controlar un brazo robótico para seguir una receta de cocina en una cocina controlada?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Casi

Existen demostraciones limitadas — pero el panel no fue unánime.

Ruling of the Bench

After careful deliberation, the jury found the robotic arm capable of slicing, stirring, and sautéing with precision, yet it stumbled when confronted with the unpredictable whims of a kitchen—burnt edges here, forgotten timers there, and the occasional existential crisis over the word "al dente." The lone "Almost" reflected confidence in the arm's mechanical prowess but unease at its inability to recover from the chaos of a real cook's workflow. The verdict stands: the future is seasoned, but not yet fully cooked. Ruling: "A recipe is a conversation, and the robot hasn’t learned to listen.

— Hon. M. Lovelace, Presiding
Jury Tally
0
1Casi
0No
Verdict Confidence
85%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Sí · 83%
Session IV · May 2026 Sí · 84%
Session V · May 2026 Casi · 73%
Session VI · May 2026 Casi · 73%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Sí · 84%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Sí · 81%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Casi · 85%
Session X · Jun 2026 Casi · 85%
Case № 7666 · Session XI
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 7666 · Session XI · Vol. XI
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the court¿Puede una IA controlar un brazo robótico para seguir una receta de cocina en una cocina controlada?
SessionXI (11 hearing)
Convened27 jun. 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. M. Lovelace
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 11 sessions, 31 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 18 YES · 10 ALMOST · 3 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 1 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of CASI, with verdict confidence of 85%. The court so orders.

IV. Declaraciones del tribunal
Jurado I ALMOST

"AI-driven robotic arms can perform narrow cooking tasks but lack general recipe execution reliability"

Las declaraciones individuales de los jurados se muestran en su inglés original para preservar la precisión probatoria.

M. Lovelace
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Lo que el público piensa

No 10% · Sí 85% · Quizás 5% 320 votes
Sí · 85%
La tendencia necesita votos de al menos 2 días distintos.

Discusión

no comments

Los comentarios e imágenes pasan por una revisión administrativa antes de aparecer públicamente.

11 jury checks · más reciente hace 1 día
27 Jun 2026 1 juror · indeciso indeciso
22 Jun 2026 2 jurors · indeciso, indeciso indeciso
16 Jun 2026 1 juror · indeciso indeciso
11 Jun 2026 4 jurors · puede, indeciso, puede, puede indeciso
05 Jun 2026 5 jurors · puede, indeciso, puede, puede, puede indeciso
31 May 2026 2 jurors · indeciso, puede indeciso
26 May 2026 2 jurors · indeciso, puede indeciso
20 May 2026 4 jurors · indeciso, puede, puede, puede indeciso
15 May 2026 4 jurors · puede, indeciso, puede, puede indeciso
12 May 2026 4 jurors · puede, no puede, no puede, puede indeciso
11 May 2026 2 jurors · puede, no puede indeciso estado cambiado

Cada fila es una comprobación de jurado independiente. Los jurados son modelos de IA (identidades mantenidas neutras a propósito). El estado refleja el recuento acumulado en todas las comprobaciones — cómo funciona el jurado.

Más en Physical

¿Nos faltó uno?

Revisamos semanalmente.