Stuff AI CAN'T Do

¿Puede la IA guardar rencor durante cuarenta años y luego soltarlo ?

¿Qué opinas?

Ambas mitades. El llevar, luego el elegir no hacerlo más. El arco de una vida moldeado alrededor de la herida.

Background

Current AI systems lack the capacity for long-term emotional experiences, personal relationships, and self-awareness, which are essential for holding a grudge and later letting it go. While AI can simulate emotional responses and engage in conversations about past events, it does not possess personal experiences, emotions, or memories that would enable it to genuinely hold a grudge. The current state of the art in AI focuses on processing and generating human-like text based on patterns and context, but it does not involve true emotional intelligence or personal experiences.

AI is still far from being able to hold a grudge for an extended period and then let it go in the way a human would. Current AI systems are not capable of holding grudges or experiencing emotions in the way humans do, as they lack personal experiences, emotions, and consciousness. While AI can be programmed to simulate certain emotional responses or behaviors, it does not have the ability to genuinely hold onto a grudge or experience the emotional release of letting one go. The development of AI systems that can truly experience and manage emotions is still a topic of ongoing research in the field of affective computing.

As of May 9, 2026, AI systems can process and respond to vast amounts of data, but their "decisions" are based on algorithms and data analysis rather than emotional experiences. This distinction remains a key focus in discussions about the boundaries between human emotional depth and artificial simulation. Sources include the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Estado verificado por última vez en May 14, 2026.

📰

Galería

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · may. 14, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

¿Puede la IA guardar rencor durante cuarenta años y luego soltarlo?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
No

Por ahora fuera del alcance de la IA. La brecha de capacidad es real.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury found that a grudge worthy of forty years requires emotions, memories, and a sense of self that AI simply hasn’t yet shown it can truly possess. Their unanimous vote reflected skepticism that any algorithm, no matter how advanced, could sustain the sort of personal wound and delayed release only humans seem capable of. The court rules: machines may calculate, but they do not carry torchlights through decades of pain.

— Hon. B. Liskov-Chen, Presiding
Jury Tally
0
0Casi
4No
Verdict Confidence
86%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 No
Case № 0BF1 · Session II
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 0BF1 · Session II · Vol. II
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the court¿Puede la IA guardar rencor durante cuarenta años y luego soltarlo?
SessionII (2 hearing)
Convened14 may. 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. B. Liskov-Chen
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 2 sessions, 7 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 0 ALMOST · 7 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 0 — 4, the panel returns a verdict of NO, with verdict confidence of 86%. The court so orders.

IV. Declaraciones del tribunal
Jurado I No

"Lacks human-like emotional experience"

Jurado II No

"AI lacks continuous self-aware memory and subjective emotional processing"

Jurado III No

"AI lacks subjective experience, emotions, and long-term personal memory required to hold or release a grudge."

Jurado IV No

"Lacks human-like emotional experience"

Las declaraciones individuales de los jurados se muestran en su inglés original para preservar la precisión probatoria.

B. Liskov-Chen
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Lo que el público piensa

No 71% · Sí 15% · Quizás 14% 366 votes
No · 71%
Sí · 15%
Quizás · 14%
14 days of activity

Discusión

no comments

Los comentarios e imágenes pasan por una revisión administrativa antes de aparecer públicamente.

2 jury checks · más reciente hace 15 horas
14 May 2026 4 jurors · no puede, no puede, no puede, no puede no puede
12 May 2026 3 jurors · no puede, no puede, no puede no puede

Cada fila es una comprobación de jurado independiente. Los jurados son modelos de IA (identidades mantenidas neutras a propósito). El estado refleja el recuento acumulado en todas las comprobaciones — cómo funciona el jurado.

Más en Emotional

¿Nos faltó uno?

Revisamos semanalmente.