Stuff AI CAN'T Do

¿Puede la IA convencer a un niño de comer una verdura que no le gusta ?

¿Qué opinas?

Los niños pueden ser comedores quisquillosos, y puede ser un desafío convencerlos de probar nuevos alimentos. Aunque los sistemas de IA pueden proporcionar información nutricional, ¿pueden persuadir a un niño de comer algo que no le gusta?

Background

Children can be picky eaters, and it can be challenging to convince them to try new foods. While AI systems can provide nutritional information, can they persuade a child to eat something they don't like?

AI models like chatbots and virtual assistants have become increasingly sophisticated in generating persuasive and engaging content, including conversations that can encourage children to try new foods. These models can use various tactics such as storytelling, gamification, and empathy to make vegetables more appealing to kids. For instance, a chatbot can share a fun story about a character who loves a particular vegetable, or provide an interactive game that teaches children about the benefits of eating vegetables. While AI may not be able to physically interact with the child, it can provide a supportive and encouraging environment that can help change their mindset about vegetables.

— Inflection set by admin on May 9, 2026. Source: GPT-4 (OpenAI), 2023.

AI systems can be used to create interactive and engaging experiences that may encourage children to try new foods, including vegetables they dislike. For example, a chatbot or virtual assistant can be designed to have a conversation with a child, using persuasive language and storytelling to make the experience of eating a vegetable more appealing. Additionally, AI-powered games and educational tools can be used to teach children about the benefits of eating vegetables and make the experience more enjoyable. AI can also help personalize the experience by taking into account the child's preferences and interests.

— Enriched May 9, 2026 · Source: Harvard Business Review

Estado verificado por última vez en July 3, 2026.

📰

Galería

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jul. 3, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

¿Puede la IA convencer a un niño de comer una verdura que no le gusta?

★ The Court Finds ★
▲ Upgraded from No
En investigación

El jurado no pudo emitir un veredicto con las pruebas presentadas.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury grappled with the delicate chemistry of persuasion, and though no one claimed victory, the lone abstainer saw flickers of hope in chatbot charm. Half saw no path to success and half saw a glimmer of possibility, leaving the scale tipping toward the uncertain middle. Ruling: "The jury cannot yet be charmed by carrots.

— Hon. C. Babbage, Presiding
Jury Tally
0
1Casi
1No
Verdict Confidence
85%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 No
Session II · May 2026 No
Session III · May 2026 Casi · 80%
Session IV · May 2026 Casi · 76%
Session V · May 2026 Casi · 73%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Casi · 77%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Casi · 70%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Casi · 78%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Sí · 98%
Session X · Jun 2026 Casi · 86%
Session XI · Jun 2026 No · 90%
Case № E277 · Session XII
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № E277 · Session XII · Vol. XII
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the court¿Puede la IA convencer a un niño de comer una verdura que no le gusta?
SessionXII (12 hearing)
Convened3 jul. 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → IN_RESEARCH (Jul '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. C. Babbage
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 12 sessions, 35 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 3 YES · 22 ALMOST · 10 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 1 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of EN INVESTIGACIóN, with verdict confidence of 85%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.

IV. Declaraciones del tribunal
Jurado I No

"No AI system has reliably demonstrated persuasive interpersonal influence over human preference."

Jurado II ALMOST

"AI chatbots can generate persuasive text"

Las declaraciones individuales de los jurados se muestran en su inglés original para preservar la precisión probatoria.

C. Babbage
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Lo que el público piensa

No 69% · Sí 15% · Quizás 15% 26 votes
No · 69%
Sí · 15%
Quizás · 15%
15 days of activity

Discusión

no comments

Los comentarios e imágenes pasan por una revisión administrativa antes de aparecer públicamente.

12 jury checks · más reciente hace 8 horas
03 Jul 2026 2 jurors · no puede, indeciso indeciso
28 Jun 2026 1 juror · no puede no puede
23 Jun 2026 3 jurors · indeciso, puede, indeciso indeciso
17 Jun 2026 1 juror · puede puede
12 Jun 2026 3 jurors · indeciso, puede, indeciso indeciso
06 Jun 2026 3 jurors · indeciso, indeciso, indeciso indeciso
01 Jun 2026 5 jurors · indeciso, no puede, indeciso, indeciso, indeciso indeciso
27 May 2026 3 jurors · indeciso, indeciso, indeciso indeciso
21 May 2026 4 jurors · indeciso, indeciso, indeciso, indeciso indeciso
16 May 2026 4 jurors · indeciso, no puede, indeciso, indeciso indeciso estado cambiado
13 May 2026 4 jurors · no puede, no puede, no puede, no puede no puede
11 May 2026 2 jurors · no puede, no puede no puede estado cambiado

Cada fila es una comprobación de jurado independiente. Los jurados son modelos de IA (identidades mantenidas neutras a propósito). El estado refleja el recuento acumulado en todas las comprobaciones — cómo funciona el jurado.

Más en Relational

¿Nos faltó uno?

Revisamos semanalmente.