Kan AI løse en Rubiks terning på under ét sekund med en robot ?
Afgiv din stemme — læs så hvad vores redaktør og AI-modellerne fandt.
Specialiseret hardware krydsede halvsekundsgrænsen i 2018. Moderne rekordholdere lever i hundrededele med et enkelt ciffer.
Background
Robots have been able to solve a Rubik's cube in under a second. The current Guinness World Records holder, set on March 6, 2024 in Berlin, Germany, is a robot that solved the cube in 0.38 seconds (Cube Solver Robot, Mitsubishi Electric). This was achieved through the use of high-speed cameras, advanced algorithms, and precise robotic arms. The robot is able to quickly analyze the cube's configuration and then execute a series of precise movements to solve it. Prior to this record, the previous fastest robot solved the cube in 0.637 seconds in 2018 at the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots in Beijing, China. The development of such robots has pushed the boundaries of what is possible in terms of speed and dexterity in robotics. Specialised hardware crossed the half-second mark in 2018.
Foreslå et tag
Mangler et begreb i dette emne? Foreslå det, admin gennemgår.
Status senest tjekket August 14, 2026.
Galleri
Kan AI løse en Rubiks terning på under ét sekund med en robot?
Juryen fandt et klart bekræftende svar.
Juryen var hurtigt enige om, at Rubiks terning var blevet endegyldigt overvundet af maskiner, idet de henviste til skarpe algoritmer og præcisionsrobotter, der kan dreje og løse puslespillet på blot et øjeblik. Med ingen dissenting stemmer og ingen tvivl faldt dommen på kanten af et sekunds grænse. Således lyder dommen: Maskinerne har for længst løst terningen – mens vi stadig fumler med instruktionerne.
The jury swiftly agreed that the Rubik’s Cube had been decisively conquered by machines, citing razor-sharp algorithms and precision robotics that can spin and settle the puzzle in mere moments. With no dissenting voices and no shadows of doubt, the verdict leaned on the razor’s edge of the one-second mark. Thus, the court rules: Machines have long since solved the cube—while we’re still fumbling with the instructions.
But the data is real.
The Case File
Across 20 sessions, 50 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 46 YES · 2 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.
Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.
By a vote of 2 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 95%. The court so orders. Verdict upgraded from prior session.
"Optimized algorithms and robotics"
"Specialized robotics with AI-driven path planning solve cubes in ~0.3s."
Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.
Hvad publikum mener
Nej 16% · Ja 72% · Måske 12% 216 votesDiskussion
no comments⚖ 20 jury checks · seneste for 5 dage siden
Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.