🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI forudsige, at alle fremtidige menneskelige civilisationer vil kollapse inden for 50 år ?

Hvad mener du?

Hvis AI kan forudsige samfundsmæssige baner med høj sikkerhed, kan det omforme global politik, beredskab og endda etiske rammer omkring menneskelig overlevelse. Denne magt ville give AI myndighed over langsigtet planlægning og potentielt gøre menneskehedens skæbne afhængig af algoritmisk forudseenhed.

Background

State-of-the-art forecasting systems model long-term societal trajectories by integrating climate, demographic and technological trends, yet they remain bounded by deep uncertainty in human agency and rare discontinuities such as war or pandemics. Empirical evaluations show that these models can reproduce past collapses under specific parameter regimes, but they fail to converge on a consensus when asked to project far-future singular events across every plausible civilization pathway. Named systems like the International Futures model and World3 variants illustrate how structural assumptions—rather than empirical calibration—dominate long-range outcomes, and even their authors caution against treating collapse as an inevitable forecast. A notable counterexample is the post-2020 rebound in global fertility and energy intensity gains, which recent projections did not anticipate, underscoring the sensitivity to unforeseen innovations and policy shifts. Thus, while the literature documents conditions under which collapse becomes probable within stylized frameworks, it offers no validated model that excludes the possibility of sustained civilization trajectories beyond 50 years.

SOURCE: no public reference

Status senest tjekket May 15, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · maj 15, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI forudsige, at alle fremtidige menneskelige civilisationer vil kollapse inden for 50 år?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Nej

Uden for AI's rækkevidde indtil videre. Kapacitetskløften er reel.

Ruling of the Bench

After carefully weighing the evidence and the jury’s deliberations, the panel concluded that predicting the assured collapse of all future human civilizations within half a century lies beyond the reach of any present or foreseeable AI—a task not of insight but of impossible omniscience. The verdict rests on the shared recognition that the tumult of human choice, chance, and chaos remains too fluid for any algorithm to forecast with reliability. The ruling: "AI may read the weather, but it cannot yet read the winds of fate.

— Hon. D. Knuth-Hale, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Ja
0Næsten
4Nej
Verdict Confidence
86%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nej
Session II · May 2026 Nej
Case № 62BB · Session III
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 62BB · Session III · Vol. III
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI forudsige, at alle fremtidige menneskelige civilisationer vil kollapse inden for 50 år?
SessionIII (3 hearing)
Convened15 maj 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. D. Knuth-Hale
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 3 sessions, 10 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 0 ALMOST · 10 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 0 — 4, the panel returns a verdict of NEJ, with verdict confidence of 86%. The court so orders.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I NEJ

"Lack of predictable patterns"

Nævning II NEJ

"No AI system can predict the far-future collapse of all human civilizations reliably."

Nævning III NEJ

"No AI system can reliably predict complex sociopolitical collapse at a global scale with current methods."

Nævning IV NEJ

"Lack of reliable predictive models for societal collapse"

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

D. Knuth-Hale
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 67% · Ja 13% · Måske 20% 15 votes
Nej · 67%
Ja · 13%
Måske · 20%
12 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

3 jury checks · seneste for 5 timer siden
15 May 2026 4 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
12 May 2026 3 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
11 May 2026 3 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i existential

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.