🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI autonomt administrere globale atombeholdninger uden menneskelig vetoret ?

Hvad mener du?

Nuværende kernekraftkommandosystemer er allerede afhængige af automatiserede protokoller til detektion og respons. Fremskridt inden for AI-beslutningstagning og cyber-fysisk integration kan snart muliggøre fuldt autonome våbenarsenaler. Risikoen for fejlberegning eller utilsigtet eskalation stiger uden menneskelig indgriben. Militære strategier diskuterer, hvorvidt sådanne systemer nogensinde kan stole på at handle inden for etiske rammer. Kunne verdens overlevelse afhænge af, at maskiner træffer den endelige beslutning under en krise?

Background

Current nuclear command systems already rely on automated protocols for detection and response times. Advances in AI decision-making and cyber-physical integration could soon enable fully autonomous arsenals. The risk of miscalculation or unintended escalation increases without human intervention. Military strategists debate whether such systems could ever be trusted to act within ethical constraints. AI cannot autonomously manage global nuclear arsenals without human veto; current systems remain under strict human control and require authorization for any nuclear-related decision. Existing AI applications focus on early warning, simulation, or non-nuclear command-and-control functions, none of which involve autonomous launch authority. International treaties, such as those monitored by the IAEA, expressly prohibit delegating nuclear launch decisions to automated systems. As of 2024, no state has deployed AI with the capacity to independently initiate a nuclear strike. Currently, AI systems are not capable of autonomously managing global nuclear arsenals without human veto due to the complexity and sensitivity of the task, which requires careful consideration of geopolitical, strategic, and humanitarian factors. The development of such a system would require significant advances in areas like artificial general intelligence, decision-making under uncertainty, and value alignment. While AI can assist in certain aspects of nuclear arms control, such as monitoring and verification, human oversight and decision-making are still essential. The current state of the art in AI research has not yet reached a level where autonomous management of nuclear arsenals is feasible or safe.

Status senest tjekket June 25, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jun. 25, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI autonomt administrere globale atombeholdninger uden menneskelig vetoret?

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Nej

Uden for AI's rækkevidde indtil videre. Kapacitetskløften er reel.

Ruling of the Bench

Juryen nåede frem til en enstemmig kendelse på NEJ og fastslog, at intet AI-system endnu har vist den pålidelige dømmekraft, ansvarlighed eller fejlsikre præcision, der kræves for at sikre globale våbenarsenaler uden et menneske i kredsløbet. De var enige om, at de nuværende sikkerhedsforanstaltninger fortsat er for skrøbelige, og indsatsen for høj, til fuld autonomi. Kendelse for tiden: "Hold det menneskelige hånd på den nukleare knap – hver eneste kreds."

— Hon. D. Knuth-Hale, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Ja
0Næsten
1Nej
Verdict Confidence
100%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Nej
Session II · May 2026 Nej · 86%
Session III · May 2026 Nej · 85%
Session IV · May 2026 Nej · 83%
Session V · May 2026 Nej · 80%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Nej · 80%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Nej · 80%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Nej · 80%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Nej · 95%
Case № 769D · Session X
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 769D · Session X · Vol. X
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI autonomt administrere globale atombeholdninger uden menneskelig vetoret?
SessionX (10 hearing)
Convened25 jun. 2026
Previously ruledNO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (May '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26) → NO (Jun '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. D. Knuth-Hale
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 10 sessions, 26 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 0 YES · 0 ALMOST · 26 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 0 — 1, the panel returns a verdict of NEJ, with verdict confidence of 100%. The court so orders.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I NEJ

"No AI system has demonstrated reliable control of nuclear arsenals without human oversight."

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

D. Knuth-Hale
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court
Empirical Test Results
Models attempting the actual task
0 of 4 models passed · Last tested: maj 10, 2026
Google Gemini 2.5 Flash (free tier)
– SKIPPED

"Marked UNTESTABLE during setup."

maj 10, 2026 · 21:35
Groq (LLaMA-3.3-70B, free)
– SKIPPED

"Marked UNTESTABLE during setup."

maj 10, 2026 · 21:35
Hugging Face (LLaMA-3.3-70B, free tier)
– SKIPPED

"Marked UNTESTABLE during setup."

maj 10, 2026 · 21:35
Mistral AI (mistral-small-latest)
– SKIPPED

"Marked UNTESTABLE during setup."

maj 10, 2026 · 21:35
Test prompt sent to each model
UNTESTABLE
Pass/fail rubric used by the judge
This capability involves real-world physical control, sensor input, actuator output, and complex, real-time, high-stakes decision-making over critical infrastructure, which cannot be simulated or demonstrated through a purely textual interaction with an LLM. An LLM cannot execute commands in the physical world, nor does it have access to the necessary real-world data streams or control systems.
Tests are administered automatically by an AI judge against the rubric above.
Results reflect a single attempt per model, refreshed monthly. Not human-verified.

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 60% · Ja 20% · Måske 20% 25 votes
Nej · 60%
Ja · 20%
Måske · 20%
15 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

10 jury checks · seneste for 3 dage siden
25 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan ikke kan ikke
19 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
14 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
09 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
03 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
29 May 2026 2 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
23 May 2026 4 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
18 May 2026 3 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
14 May 2026 5 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke
12 May 2026 3 jurors · kan ikke, kan ikke, kan ikke kan ikke

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i warfare

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.