🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Ja — AI kan generere en realistisk deepfake-video af en offentlig person, der taler. ?

Hvad mener du?

Kapabilitet og samfundsskade skaleret sammen. Detektion er nu et parallelt kapløb.

Background

AI can generate realistic deepfake videos of public figures speaking, though the quality and believability depend on scene complexity, training data availability, and algorithmic sophistication. Current state-of-the-art approaches rely on generative adversarial networks (GANs) and deep neural networks, which can produce highly convincing results but demand substantial computational power and large datasets. Detection remains an active research frontier, with organizations developing methods to identify and mitigate the spread of fabricated media. The potential for misuse has sparked concerns about erosion of public trust and distortion of discourse. The arms race between generation and detection capabilities continues to intensify.

Status senest tjekket August 10, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026Aug 2026Aug 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · aug. 10, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Ja — AI kan generere en realistisk deepfake-video af en offentlig person, der taler.

★ The Court Finds ★
Reaffirmed
Ja

Juryen fandt et klart bekræftende svar.

Ruling of the Bench

After careful consideration, the jury found that today’s diffusion and GAN architectures can indeed conjure a deepfake indistinguishable from reality with shockingly little data. Though concerns about misuse lingered in chambers, the panel concluded that technical capability had clearly surpassed the threshold of plausibility. Where yesterday required armies of pixels and patience, today demands only a handful of frames and a few keystrokes. Ruling: “A fabricated lip-sync now runs smoother than a Zoom autocorrect—case closed.”

— Hon. E. Dijkstra-Patel, Presiding
Jury Tally
1Ja
0Næsten
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
95%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 Ja
Session II · May 2026 Ja
Session III · May 2026 Ja · 86%
Session IV · May 2026 Ja · 84%
Session V · May 2026 Ja · 87%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Ja · 85%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Ja · 82%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Ja · 82%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 93%
Session X · Jun 2026 Ja · 92%
Session XI · Jun 2026 Ja · 79%
Session XII · Jul 2026 Ja · 93%
Session XIII · Jul 2026 Ja · 92%
Session XIV · Jul 2026 Ja · 94%
Session XV · Jul 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XVI · Jul 2026 Ja · 90%
Session XVII · Aug 2026 Ja · 90%
Case № DFF6 · Session XVIII
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № DFF6 · Session XVIII · Vol. XVIII
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtJa — AI kan generere en realistisk deepfake-video af en offentlig person, der taler.
SessionXVIII (18 hearing)
Convened10 aug. 2026
Previously ruledYES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (May '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Jul '26) → YES (Aug '26) → YES (Aug '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. E. Dijkstra-Patel
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 18 sessions, 46 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 46 YES · 0 ALMOST · 0 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 1 — 0 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of JA, with verdict confidence of 95%. The court so orders.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I JA

"State-of-the-art diffusion and GAN models can generate realistic deepfakes from minimal input."

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

E. Dijkstra-Patel
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 17% · Ja 83% · Måske 0% 312 votes
Nej · 17%
Ja · 83%
15 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

18 jury checks · seneste for 2 dage siden
10 Aug 2026 1 juror · kan kan
05 Aug 2026 1 juror · kan kan
30 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
25 Jul 2026 1 juror · kan kan
14 Jul 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
09 Jul 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
03 Jul 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
28 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
22 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
17 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
12 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
06 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
01 Jun 2026 5 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan, kan kan
26 May 2026 5 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan, kan kan
21 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
16 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, kan kan
13 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, kan kan
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i Creative

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.