Kan AI diagnosticere visse sjældne sygdomme ud fra elektroniske patientjournaler ?
Afgiv din stemme — læs så hvad vores redaktør og AI-modellerne fandt.
Diagnostiske ledsagemodeller i 2024 fandt tilfælde af sjældne tilstande, som klinikere havde overset, både i træningsdata og i levende forsøg.
Background
Over the past few years several groups have built transformer-based models that read longitudinal EHR sequences and flag patients whose symptom trajectories match curated rare-disease cohorts. In 2023 a system trained on more than 30,000 US patient records achieved a positive predictive value above 0.7 for four lysosomal storage disorders but fell below 0.5 for a rarer glycogenosis subtype, illustrating uneven performance across disorders. A multi-centre study published the same year compared two proprietary LLMs fine-tuned on anonymised records from specialist clinics and found they recovered 79 % of previously missed cases of Niemann-Pick type C while introducing one false positive per ten true positives. Workflows that combine structured billing codes with unstructured clinician notes have shown the biggest gains, yet they remain brittle when applied to centres whose documentation styles diverge from the training corpora. At least one large health-system rollout was paused after an audit revealed clinically significant drift when ICD-10 codes were updated, underscoring the maintenance burden of keeping rare-disease models current.
SOURCE: BMJ, 2024
Foreslå et tag
Mangler et begreb i dette emne? Foreslå det, admin gennemgår.
Status senest tjekket August 19, 2026.
Galleri
Kan AI diagnosticere visse sjældne sygdomme ud fra elektroniske patientjournaler?
Snævre demoer findes — men panelet var ikke enigt.
Efter at have vejet beviserne fandt juryen, at AI er i stand til at diagnosticere visse sjældne sygdomme ud fra elektroniske patientjournaler under begrænsede forhold, men endnu ikke er universelt pålidelig – en sondring, som begge jurymedlemmer indfangede med deres "Næsten"-domme. De var enige om, at AI udmærker sig inden for snævre områder, men vakler, når den skal generalisere på tværs af det store landskab af sjældne tilstande. Retssalens kendelse: "AI kan spotte nålene i høstakken, men den har endnu ikke lært at navngive hver eneste nål – kun dem, den er blevet trænet til at genkende."
After weighing the evidence, the jury found AI capable of diagnosing certain rare diseases from electronic health records under constrained conditions, but not yet universally reliable—a distinction both jurors captured with their "Almost" verdicts. They agreed AI excels in narrow domains but falters when asked to generalize across the vast landscape of rare conditions. The bench’s ruling: "AI can spot the needles in the haystack, but it hasn’t yet learned to name every needle—just the ones it’s been trained to hold.
But the data is real.
The Case File
Across 21 sessions, 56 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 9 YES · 44 ALMOST · 3 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.
Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.
By a vote of 0 — 2 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of NæSTEN, with verdict confidence of 82%. The court so orders.
"Narrow AI models have demonstrated rare disease detection from EHR in limited studies, but not general, reliable across all rare conditions."
"Specialized AI models diagnose rare diseases from EHRs in narrow domains with partial reliability."
Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.
Hvad publikum mener
Nej 6% · Ja 91% · Måske 3% 236 votesDiskussion
no comments⚖ 21 jury checks · seneste for 43 minutter siden
Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.
Flere i Judgment
Kan AI anbefale personlig medicinsk behandling baseret på patienthistorik ?
Kan AI forudsige individuelle personlighedstræk og fremtidig kriminel adfærd med 95 % nøjagtighed ved hjælp af hjerneafbildning og AI-analyse ?
Kan AI forbedre og accelerere menneskets udvikling ?