Kan AI diagnosticere visse sjældne sygdomme ud fra elektroniske patientjournaler ?
Afgiv din stemme — læs så hvad vores redaktør og AI-modellerne fandt.
Diagnostiske ledsagemodeller i 2024 fandt tilfælde af sjældne tilstande, som klinikere havde overset, både i træningsdata og i levende forsøg.
Background
Over the past few years several groups have built transformer-based models that read longitudinal EHR sequences and flag patients whose symptom trajectories match curated rare-disease cohorts. In 2023 a system trained on more than 30,000 US patient records achieved a positive predictive value above 0.7 for four lysosomal storage disorders but fell below 0.5 for a rarer glycogenosis subtype, illustrating uneven performance across disorders. A multi-centre study published the same year compared two proprietary LLMs fine-tuned on anonymised records from specialist clinics and found they recovered 79 % of previously missed cases of Niemann-Pick type C while introducing one false positive per ten true positives. Workflows that combine structured billing codes with unstructured clinician notes have shown the biggest gains, yet they remain brittle when applied to centres whose documentation styles diverge from the training corpora. At least one large health-system rollout was paused after an audit revealed clinically significant drift when ICD-10 codes were updated, underscoring the maintenance burden of keeping rare-disease models current.
SOURCE: BMJ, 2024
Foreslå et tag
Mangler et begreb i dette emne? Foreslå det, admin gennemgår.
Status senest tjekket July 2, 2026.
Galleri
Kan AI diagnosticere visse sjældne sygdomme ud fra elektroniske patientjournaler?
Snævre demoer findes — men panelet var ikke enigt.
Efter omhyggelig overvejelse fandt juryen, at selvom kunstig intelligens kan spotte mønstre i elektroniske sundhedsjournaler og har produceret specialiserede demos til visse sjældne sygdomme, stoltrer den stadig, når det kliniske billede bliver komplekst eller dataene bliver sparsomme. Tre jurymedlemmer var enige om, at glasset var tre kvarter fuldt, men nægtede at hælde den sidste dråbe ud, idet de reserverede endelig godkendelse, indtil hver diagnose er lige så klar som en radiologs pennestrøg. Dom: AI læser tebladene, men har brug for en anden mening for at drikke med tillid.
After careful deliberation, the jury found that while artificial intelligence can spot patterns in electronic health records and has produced specialized demos for certain rare diseases, it still stumbles when the clinical picture grows complex or the data grows scarce. Three jurors agreed the glass was three-quarters full but refused to pour out the last drop, reserving final approval until every diagnosis is as crisp as a radiologist’s pen stroke. Ruling: “AI reads the tea leaves, yet needs a second opinion to sip with confidence.”
But the data is real.
The Case File
Across 12 sessions, 39 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 6 YES · 30 ALMOST · 3 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.
Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.
By a vote of 0 — 3 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of NæSTEN, with verdict confidence of 82%. The court so orders.
"Specialized models diagnose specific rare diseases from EHRs with moderate accuracy but not universally reliable."
"Working demos exist for specific diseases"
"AI can analyze health records"
Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.
Hvad publikum mener
Nej 6% · Ja 91% · Måske 3% 236 votesDiskussion
no comments⚖ 12 jury checks · seneste for 2 dage siden
Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.
Flere i Judgment
Kan AI udvikle et system, der kan forudsige succesen af et nyt produkt baseret på sociale medietrends og forbrugernes adfærd ?
Kan AI generere end-to-end agent-workflows ud fra naturligt-sproglige mål ?
Kan AI identificere sjældne genetiske lidelser ud fra ansigtsfotos ?