🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere · 🔥 Hot topics · KAN IKKE · Kan · § The Court · Seneste omvendinger · 📈 Tidslinje · Spørg · Ledere
Stuff AI CAN'T Do

Kan AI designe en protese, der kan styres af en persons tanker og muskelsignaler ?

Hvad mener du?

Protetiske lemmer har forbedret sig betydeligt de seneste år, men at kontrollere dem kan stadig være en udfordring. Fremskridt inden for hjerne-computer-grænseflader og maskinlæring kan hjælpe.

Background

Prosthetic limbs have improved significantly in recent years, but controlling them can still be a challenge. Advances in brain-computer interfaces and machine learning can help.

Researchers have made significant progress in developing prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by a person's thoughts and muscle signals, using advanced technologies such as electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). These prosthetics can decode brain signals and muscle activity, allowing individuals to control the movement of the prosthetic limb with a high degree of precision. Current systems often rely on invasive or partially invasive methods, such as implanting electrodes in the brain or muscles, but non-invasive methods are also being explored. The development of these thought-controlled prosthetics has the potential to greatly improve the quality of life for individuals with amputations or other motor disorders.— Enriched May 9, 2026 · Source: National Institutes of Health

Recent advancements in brain-computer interfaces and machine learning have enabled the development of prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by a person's thoughts and muscle signals. For example, models like the DEKA Arm System and the MindControl system have been successfully tested, allowing individuals to control prosthetic limbs with high precision. These systems use electromyography and electroencephalography signals to decode the user's intentions and translate them into prosthetic movements. While there is still room for improvement, AI-powered prosthetic limbs have made significant progress in recent years.— Inflection set by admin on May 9, 2026. Source: DEKA Arm System (DEKA Research & Development Corp.), 2022.

Status senest tjekket July 3, 2026.

📰

Galleri

In the Court of AI Capability
Summary of Findings
Verdict over time
May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026
Sitting at the Bench Filed · jul. 3, 2026
— The Question Before the Court —

Kan AI designe en protese, der kan styres af en persons tanker og muskelsignaler?

★ The Court Finds ★
▼ Downgraded from Ja
Næsten

Snævre demoer findes — men panelet var ikke enigt.

Ruling of the Bench

The jury paused at the threshold of the possible, nodding at the dazzling demonstrations of mind-controlled prosthetics and the seamless chatter between neurons and machines, yet holding back with a gentle hesitation; the hardware still feels more visitor than native, arriving in pieces rather than as a single seamless limb. The two almost-votes reflect wonder at today’s interface miracles tempered by the unanswered question of tomorrow’s wearer—will the technology ever stop feeling borrowed, or will it finally feel like one’s own flesh? Ruling: "Thoughts may steer the limb, but the limb has not yet moved into the heart.

— Hon. G. Hopper, Presiding
Jury Tally
0Ja
2Næsten
0Nej
Verdict Confidence
83%
The Court of AI Capability is, of course, not a real court.
But the data is real.
The Case File · Stacked History
Session I · May 2026 In_research
Session II · May 2026 In_research
Session III · May 2026 Ja · 85%
Session IV · May 2026 Næsten · 81%
Session V · May 2026 Næsten · 73%
Session VI · Jun 2026 Næsten · 78%
Session VII · Jun 2026 Næsten · 77%
Session VIII · Jun 2026 Ja · 80%
Session IX · Jun 2026 Ja · 95%
Session X · Jun 2026 Ja · 77%
Session XI · Jun 2026 Ja · 95%
Case № 8184 · Session XII
In the Court of AI Capability

The Case File

Docket № 8184 · Session XII · Vol. XII
I. Particulars of the Case
Question put to the courtKan AI designe en protese, der kan styres af en persons tanker og muskelsignaler?
SessionXII (12 hearing)
Convened3 jul. 2026
Previously ruledIN_RESEARCH (May '26) → IN_RESEARCH (May '26) → YES (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (May '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → YES (Jun '26) → ALMOST (Jul '26)
Presiding JudgeHon. G. Hopper
II. Cumulative Tally Across Sessions

Across 12 sessions, 29 jurors have heard this case. Combined tally: 15 YES · 12 ALMOST · 2 NO · 0 IN RESEARCH.

Note: cumulative includes older juror opinions. The current session tally above is the live verdict.

III. Verdict

By a vote of 0 — 2 — 0, the panel returns a verdict of NæSTEN, with verdict confidence of 83%. The court so orders. Verdict downgraded from prior session.

IV. Udtalelser fra dommerpanelet
Nævning I ALMOST

"Brain-machine interfaces decode neural signals, but full integration with prosthetics is still emerging."

Nævning II ALMOST

"Brain-computer interfaces and AI-powered prosthetics exist"

Individuelle nævningers udtalelser vises på originalengelsk for at bevare bevismæssig præcision.

G. Hopper
Presiding Judge
M. Lovelace
Clerk of the Court

Hvad publikum mener

Nej 46% · Ja 42% · Måske 12% 26 votes
Nej · 46%
Ja · 42%
Måske · 12%
15 days of activity

Diskussion

no comments

Kommentarer og billeder gennemgår admin-godkendelse før de vises offentligt.

12 jury checks · seneste for 7 timer siden
03 Jul 2026 2 jurors · uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
28 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
23 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan kan
17 Jun 2026 1 juror · kan kan
12 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
06 Jun 2026 2 jurors · kan, uafklaret uafklaret
01 Jun 2026 3 jurors · kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
27 May 2026 2 jurors · uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
21 May 2026 4 jurors · uafklaret, kan, uafklaret, uafklaret uafklaret
16 May 2026 4 jurors · kan, kan, kan, uafklaret uafklaret
13 May 2026 3 jurors · kan, kan ikke, kan uafklaret
11 May 2026 2 jurors · kan, kan ikke uafklaret status ændret

Hver række er et separat jurytjek. Nævninger er AI-modeller (identiteter holdt neutrale med vilje). Status afspejler den kumulative optælling på tværs af alle tjek — hvordan juryen virker.

Flere i Physical

Har du en vi gik glip af?

Tilføj et udsagn til atlasset. Vi gennemgår ugentligt.